Your article, "Bluewater Tests Wi-fi Exposure" (web-posted Tuesday, 31 August 2010 10:14), even with its responsible intent, unfortunately reports irrelevancy directly and indirectly.
What is directly relevant is demonstrable biological effect, both from direct experience and scientific observation. Health Canada's so-called Safety Code 6 is precisely at the centre of the controversy. Their acquiescence in lopping off of dissenting science, which would corroborate the effects experienced by some local children, renders appeal to them directly irrelevant.
Letters













