You are here: Home Letters Letters Reader: Why is Meaford Still Entertaining WTE Proposal?

The Meaford Independent

We want to hear from you!  Email Letters to the Editor to:   editor@themeafordindependent.ca
All letters must include the author's full name, address and telephone number for verification purposes.
Only your name and the city/town where you live will be published.
Opinions expressed in letters to the editor are those of the letter authors and not of The Meaford Independent.

Reader: Why is Meaford Still Entertaining WTE Proposal?

E-mail Print PDF

Dear Editor,

I understand how difficult it can be to set an annual budget to operate an entire municipality, and I don’t envy those that have the task of completing it.

However, I must ask this question. Why is Meaford keeping any budget at all for a Waste-to-Energy (WTE) project? It was a great step to take half of the $51,000 away from the project, but why not all? I’m sure there are much more pressing and important issues that could use the remaining $26,000.

Regardless of the outcome of the review of the FIT program, whether it is Partners Energy Group (PEG) or some other company why should Meaford set aside any money to pay for an application to the Ontario Power Authority. If the company can’t come up with the money for the application, how are they going to fund the project?

Meaford Against Gasification Group (MAGG) members have collected over 2,000 signatures from residents who do not want a WTE project. The environmental and health impacts that incineration causes are staggering. MAGG has also proven with various phone calls, emails and web searches that the proposal by PEG had falsified data in it. The unit that PEG wants to build has never been tested as a full scale WTE operation using municipal solid waste (MSW) or “wood waste”. The only testing documentation that has been found on the proposed “Brookes unit” was used on a short term basis to burn animal carcasses, wheat straw or pig feces….hardly the same as a burning MSW and/or wood waste 24/7, 365 days a year.

I understand that the WTE proposal has been tabled until PEG holds a public meeting. (The first of which was mysteriously cancelled 5 days before the scheduled meeting after the managing director was confronted on the radio about WTE not qualifying for the FIT program.) But why is the municipality still entertaining the idea of dealing with a company who falsely presented themselves?

Meaford doesn’t want to make in onto MacLean's Magazines list of the 99 dumbest things politicians spent public money on do they? (Unlike the Durham region who spent taxpayers money on a lavish ground-breaking party for the Durham incinerator.)

Food for thought.

Regards,

Jenean Lush, MAGG Spokesperson


+ 55
+ 5
 
tourism_award_thank_you
Banner


gw_mini_ad
grants_mini_adcopy
Banner


Banner


Jim_Sharon_Gray_ad
homebuttons_mini
facebook-logo
Follow us on Twitter

Search All Articles


Advertisement

Banner

march-ad


yardsalepromo

TMI Poll

Should Meaford's council pass a bylaw to implement a minimum setback for industrial wind turbines of two kilometres?
 

Who's Online

We have 260 guests online

Advertisement

Banner

Advertisement

filmsforthought

Advertisement

Banner